Legal Opinion
Ruck Corp. v. Woudenberg
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 12, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3427PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The Ruck Corporation (Ruck) entered into a written contract for the construction of a commercial building on the land owned by the Woudenbergs. Neither party was liable under the contract until the Woudenbergs secured 100% financing approved by Ruck.
The Woudenbergs applied to the Union Bank for a construction loan and were eventually notified that the bank had approved a loan. Believing that the loan approved by the bank complied with their contract with Ruck, Woundenbergs told Ruck that they had the required financing and made several demands upon Ruck to commence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Advance Leasing & Crane Co. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Fonda Corp. v. Southern Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Manley v. MacFarlandIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Mergenthaler v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. High Country Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Conant v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- ABC Supply, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.