Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pruitt v. Moon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1959No. 5-1913Published

1DissentJim Johnson, Associate Justice

There can be no doubt as to this claimant’s permanent loss of vision in his right eye since that eye has been removed and is now gone forever. An abundance of substantial testimony was offered to show that this claimant did actually suffer an injury in the course of his employment and that he was treated for three separate injuries to his eye. Nowhere in the record can it be found that claimant’s present condition is not the result of an accident suffered in the course of his employment. It is true that the testimony relative to the exact date of the last injury is somewhat in conflict.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Reynolds Metal Company v. BrumleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Bales, Admx. v. Service Club No. 1, Camp ChaffeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Boyd Excelsior Fuel Company v. McKownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API