Legal Opinion

Reynolds Metal Company v. Brumley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 21, 1956No. 5-927PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MmoK W. Millwee, Associate Justice.

This case involves the applicable statute governing the time limit within which a claim for additional compensation must be filed under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

There is no dispute in the material facts. Appellee, William J. Brumley, suffered a cerebral thrombosis while working for appellant, Reynolds Metals Company, on September 20, 1950, resulting in an immediate loss of vision in the left eye and a slight paralysis of the left side of his body. His claim for compensation was controverted by the company and its insurance carrier. After hearings…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Triebsch v. Athletic Mining & Smelting CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Jefferson v. NeroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Ragon v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Ketchell v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Heflin v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Graeber Bros., Inc. v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McFall v. United States Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API