Legal Opinion

Showalter v. City of Cheney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 23, 2003No. 21548-2-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

During a downtown revitalization project, the city of Cheney (City) ordered Thomas and Robin Showalter to remove a canopy attached to the front of their downtown tavern and resting on the sidewalk. The Showalters sued to enjoin the removal of the canopy. Although the trial court granted a partial summary judgment dismissing the Showalters’ complaint, it held that removal of the canopy was a taking of private property for public use, subject to compensation. A jury later awarded the Showalters $20,000 for the cost to replace the canopy, minus depreciation and other benefits.

On appeal, City…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Proctor v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Proctor v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Brotherson v. Professional Basketball Club, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  4. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Heirs & Devisees of EasteyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND TRANSIT v. EasteyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API