Wisconsin Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Kriesel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
Although the owners of the homestead did not appear, answer, or in any wise assert that exemption, the trial court very properly, and under Circuit Court Rule XXV so providing, inquired as to the situation and made appropriate findings as to the existence of the homestead, and none of those here asserting liens against the-property can be heard to object to such findings. The findings and judgment describe the homestead as the N. W. J4 of the S. E. of section 5, although in the testimony it is stated as being the S. W. of the S. E. yi, and if there be error in the description it may of course…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Levy v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Rozek v. RedzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Davis v. SteepsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Berger v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Rising v. DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donald W. Pelfresne v. Village of Williams BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- In re ClarkDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
- Ford v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Ford v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991