Rozek v. Redzinski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Brown County. Tife facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. To the point that the action would lie, they cited Gates v. Boomer, 17 "Wis. 157; Hyde v. Ghapmcm, 33 id. 391,400; Mason v. Pierron, 63 id. 245; Marston v. Dresen, 76 id. 418; Basham v. Pfeff, 79 id. 161; Cornell v. Radway, 22 id. 264; Galloway v. Hamilton, 68 id. 653; Adsit v. Butler, 87 N. T. 585.
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 23, 1894:
Orton, C. J.
This is a suit in equity, in aid of an execution. The facts are, substantially and briefly, as follows:
The defendant Martin Redzinski and four others were partners in the ownership and operation of a steam thresher, and while engaged in threshing the grain of the plaintiff, *527in March, 1891, negligently permitted fire to escape and burn up the property of the plaintiff, of the value of about §1,645.93, for which sum the plaintiff obtained judgment against them, as damages and costs, June 24, 1892. On the 21st day of November, 1892,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dreutzer v. BellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Gilbert v. StockmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Horton v. DeweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Pike v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Hanson v. EdgarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Birmingham v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- McNally v. McAndrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Lipman v. MangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Mounce v. WightmanArizona Supreme Court · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.