Ford v. Kenosha County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentChief Justice Heffernan
Because this court is obligated to liberally construe pleadings with a view to "substantial justice" to the parties and because the allegations and inferences in the plaintiffs complaint do not establish that the clerk of circuit court's office acted at the direction of the judge, I would reverse the trial court's dismissal for failure to state a claim against the clerical personnel. Accordingly, I dissent in part.
*510Wisconsin's rules of civil procedure provide for notice pleading. Under sec. 802.02(1)(a), Stats., a party's claim for relief need only contain "[a] short and plain statement of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.