Legal Opinion

Heineman v. Bright

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1998No. 1557, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherrie L. Krauser, Judge

(Specially Assigned).

Jacklyn Kay Heineman (Ms. Heineman) and her daughter, Toy Michelle Evans, (appellants) appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City entered in favor of appellees, Julie W. Bright and her sisters, as personal representatives of the estate of their father, G. Wendel Heineman (the Estate). That judgment awarded to the Estate certain bonds that Ms. Heineman claimed Mr. Heineman gave her during their marriage. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the only testimony available to support Ms. Heineman’s claim, we affirm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Lynch v. R. E. Tull & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Shelton v. KirsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Dorsey v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Reddy v. ModyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Smithsburg Emergency Medical ServiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Maddox v. StoneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Storetrax.com, Inc. v. GurlandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Warehime v. DellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API