Legal Opinion

Warehime v. Dell

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 1, 1998No. 165, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

In this case, we must determine whether the circuit court was entitled to dismiss appellants’ complaint against nine defendants/appellees, as a sanction for appellants’ failure to respond to interrogatories propounded by only one defendant/appellee.

On December 9, 1992, Marianne and Earl A.J. Warehime, appellants, instituted suit in the Circuit Court for Carroll County against nine members of the Manchester Fire Engine and Hook and Ladder Co. No. 1 (the “Company”), all of whom are appellees. 1 The suit alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Article 24 of the Maryland…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Jacqueline Payne Jacob Payne Randy W. Lowe Ferdinand Samuel v. Exxon Corporation Exxon Company USA Exxon Shipping Company and Veco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Klupt v. KrongardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Green v. BrooksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Sindler v. LitmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Lowery v. Smithsburg Emergency Medical ServiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API