Legal Opinion

Lynch v. R. E. Tull & Sons, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 6, 1968No. [No. 375, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

Maryland Rule 417 d provides that “if, after proper service of interrogatories upon a party, he fails to serve answers to them within the time allowed [by Rule 417 b], the court on motion and notice may strike out all or any part of any pleading of that party, or dismiss the action or any part thereof, or enter a judgment by default or decree pro confesso against that party.” This Court has held that upon failure of a party to answer interrogatories, under Rules 417 and 422 c, the court in the exercise of a sound discretion may punish the offending party by dismissing his action with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Miller v. TalbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Smith v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Guerriero v. Friendly Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Pfeiffer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Klupt v. KrongardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Broadwater v. ArchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Lowery v. Smithsburg Emergency Medical ServiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. American Home Assurance Co. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API