In re Guardianship of Pates
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Appellant-siblings challenge an order appointing their brother, respondent David Younkin, as conservator for their mother and granting him limited protective powers over her person. Appellants assert that their mother does not need a conservator or, alternatively, that appellant Abraham Younkin had priority and should have been appointed conservator. In addition, they claim that the district court erred by granting respondent limited protective powers and failing to require a cost bond. We affirm the district court’s appointment of respondent as conservator. Because the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Swenson v. NickaboineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Schmidt v. HebeisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Guardianship of TschumyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao and o/b/o Zhaokui Yuan v. Peiliang YuanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014