Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of Tschumy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 2013No. A12-2179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant guardian challenges the district court’s determination that he was required to seek an order from the district court to authorize the discontinuation of a permanently unconscious ward’s life-sup*766port systems. Because the statutory grant of medical-consent power to a guardian, unless otherwise limited by court order, encompasses the authority to discontinue medical treatment for a permanently unconscious ward, we conclude that, if no interested party has objected, a guardian holding that power need not seek an order from the district court before authorizing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Matter of JobesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Guardianship of QuichochoSuperior Court of Guam · 2021
  3. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API