United States v. Dan Holman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSTONE, District Judge.
Dan Holman appeals the rejection of his plea agreement by the district court. Three specific questions are presented. First, whether at the time the plea was taken the district court unqualifiedly accepted the agreement reached between Holman and the government. Second, if the agreement was accepted, whether the court could later reject the bargain based on information contained in a presentence report. Third, if the court’s rejection was improper, whether Holman’s subsequent guilty plea pursuant to a new plea agreement cured the error. For the reasons stated below…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Claude L. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Natividad Ocanas, Santiago Casiano, Jr., Ramiro Gonzalez Alvarado, Rogelio Jose De La Garza and Amadeo Uresti GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Carlos Rodriguez CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. FoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Paul R. Edgecomb (88-3853) and Gordon R. Edgecomb (88-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.