State v. Delisle
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Defendant appeals a jury conviction of second-degree murder. The principal issue is how the jury should be instructed when a lesser-included offense supported by the evidence is barred by the statute of limitations. We conclude that, in such a situation, the defendant should have a choice between foregoing an instruction on the lesser offense or obtaining an instruction informing the jury that, because the passage of time precludes prosecution for the lesser offense, it must acquit the defendant if it determines the evidence would support a conviction for that offense alone. Because the court…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TiedemannUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. OsakalumiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Collins v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.