Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul R. Edgecomb (88-3853) and Gordon R. Edgecomb (88-3943)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1990No. 88-3853, 88-3943PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Paul R. Edgecomb (“Paul”) and Gordon R. Edgecomb (“Gordon”) appeal their sentences resulting from their guilty pleas to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and remand in part.
I
On January 11, 1988, Gordon was indicted on three counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988) and one count of conpiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On April 6, 1988, a superseding indictment was filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- David Wayne Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (84-5140), Charles T. Cornett (84-5141), James Harold Coldiron (84-5158)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael I. MonusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. LalondeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. John P. MosconyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.