Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Rodriguez Cruz

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 8, 1983No. 82-1600PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether a district court judge can unqualifiedly accept a bargained guilty plea and subsequently reject it on the basis of information contained in the presentence reports of the defendant and two codefendants. A rehearsal of the proceedings below is necessary.

Defendant-appellant, Carlos Rodriguez Cruz, was indicted on July 8, 1981, for aiding and abetting and possessing with intent to distribute one hundred twenty-five grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), a felony, and in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. Three other defendants…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Clifton Fransaw v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Jesus Antonio Partida-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. FoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API