Cooper v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County and from an order denying a new trial.E. A. Bridgford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of certain town lots. Plaintiff’s claim of title is based upon a tax deed, executed by the tax-collector of Central Irrigation District, upon a sale for a delinquent tax levied by the board of directors of said district. Defendants appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial, and claim that the assessment, levy, sale, and deed made thereunder are void.
Section 30 of the irrigation act (Stats. 1887, p. 40) provides: “ The matter recited in the certificate of sale must be recited in the deed, and such deed duly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terrill v. GrovesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Weaver v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Tregea v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Houghton v. Kern Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Sheeter v. LifurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.