Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county canceling a resale tax deed held by the county.
Plaintiff below attacked the deed on two separate grounds.: First, that it was void on its face in that it purports to convey a part of two town lots together and for a single consideration; second, that the assessment upon which the deed was based was also void for the reason that the two parcels were assessed together. The trial court sustained both of plaintiff’s contentions.
It is asserted that these two parcels must be treated as separate tracts for the purpose of taxation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Frazier v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Town of Grove v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Elerick v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wasden v. FoellIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Hales v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Hefner v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Knisely v. Board of Trustees of Town of SkiatookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Flint v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.