Dr. Ing HCF Porsche AG v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over petitioner (Porsche), who seeks mandate to compel the trial court to vacate its order denying petitioner’s motions to quash service of summons and to dismiss pursuant to section 581a, Code of Civil Procedure.
This action for wrongful death arises from a single car accident on May 16, 1977. Plaintiffs’ decedent, a passenger in a 1977 Porsche automobile owned and driven by another person who, like petitioner, is a defendant herein, was killed when the Porsche left the roadway of Brannan…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gebr. Eickhoff Maschinenfabrik Und Eisengieberei mbH v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Richardson v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Rivers v. Stihl, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Sacotte v. Ideal-Werk Krug & Priester MacHinen-fabrikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.