Legal Opinion
Zeiger v. Wellpet LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 17, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–04056–WHOPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William H. Orrick, United States District Judge *842INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Daniel Zeiger, Danz Doggie Daytrips ("Danz"), and Amy Freeborn allege that WellPet LLC ("WellPet") and its parent company Berwind Corporation ("Berwind," and collectively with WellPet, "defendants") manufacture, market, and sell certain dog food products that are contaminated with the toxins arsenic and lead, and the chemical Bisphenol A ("BPA"). Plaintiffs allege that defendants knowingly, recklessly, or negligently sold these contaminated products without disclosing their presence on the labels, which make certain health…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Augustine v. Talking Rain Beverage Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Brown v. Van's International Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Classick v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.