Legal Opinion

Beloit Building Co. v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 32,063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*409The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was an action for specific performance of a party wall option contract after the defendant had exercised her option in favor of purchasing a half interest in the wall, already constructed, and also for an injunction to prevent her from using the wall without complying with the terms of the contract.

A copy of the party wall option 'contract was attached to the petition, also a copy of a supplemental contract, a copy of a stipulation of acceptance and a copy of a disputed appraisement award. Later an amended petition was filed,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Guild v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Watts v. KellarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Zelleken v. LynchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Peckham v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBauge Bros., Inc. v. WhitsittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Beloit Building Co. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API