Legal Opinion

Beloit Building Co. v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1937No. 33,182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

The action was for the specific performance of a party-wall agreement. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

This is the second chapter in the history of the litigation over this party-wall contract. See Beloit Bldg. Co. v. Quinn, 141 Kan. 408, 41 P. 2d 762, and opinion on rehearing, 141 Kan. 762, 44 P. 2d 232.

For a succinct statement of the facts we quote from our former opinion:

“The petition alleges that the original party-wall option contract was made and executed May 7, 1889, by the plaintiff as owner of the west…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henderson v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Southworth v. PerringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Stroud v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Caruthers v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Schlup v. BourdonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. Traywick v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Uhl v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API