Beloit Building Co. v. Quinn
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allen, J.:
The action was for the specific performance of a party-wall agreement. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
This is the second chapter in the history of the litigation over this party-wall contract. See Beloit Bldg. Co. v. Quinn, 141 Kan. 408, 41 P. 2d 762, and opinion on rehearing, 141 Kan. 762, 44 P. 2d 232.
For a succinct statement of the facts we quote from our former opinion:
“The petition alleges that the original party-wall option contract was made and executed May 7, 1889, by the plaintiff as owner of the west…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Southworth v. PerringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Stroud v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Caruthers v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Schlup v. BourdonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
- Traywick v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Uhl v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.