Robinson v. Frankel
Tennessee Supreme Court
Appeal from Chancery Court of Bedford County. E. L>. Hancock, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
Those three causes have been heard together, as the evidence relied upon to establish the fraudulent character of the conveyance attacked is the same in each case. The complainants are creditors of the defendant, M. Frankel, and the several bills have been filed for the purpose of attacking as fraudulent and void a sale made by their debtor of a large stock of merchandise to his brother, the defendant, IT. Frankel. The defendant, M, Frankel, was a merchant doing busi*477ness in Slielbyville, Term., under his own name, and conducting a similar business under the name of Isaac Erankel at Pulaski,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hendricks v. RobinsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bank of Blount County v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- Hartnett v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Bank of Hendersonville v. DozierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Union Bank v. ChaffinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Dillard & Coffin Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.