Legal Opinion

Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM HARDEMAN. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hardeman Comity. A. G-. Hawkins, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The firm of Smith Bros, was composed of T. M. Smith and J. L. Smith, and was engaged in the mercantile business at Cedar Chapel, in Hard-eman County. On the' first of January, 1898, the firm sold its stock of merchandise, together with a house and lot, a mule, horse, two-horse wagon, and cow, to Samuel Smith, a brother, the recited consideration being the satisfaction! of a debt due to the brother from the firm of $580, and a note *374for about $1,570, payable to tbe firm April 1, 1898, tbe entire consideration being $2,158. It appears tbat all the property belonged to tbe firm, and was used as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. FrankelTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Solinsky v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Montlake Coal Co. v. Chattanooga Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Keller v. Fowler Bros. & CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hallack v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Commerce Union Bank v. SharberCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API