Spencer v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Spencer and a co-defendant, Bernard Bishop, were convicted of distributing cocaine, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1993). Spencer noted an appeal from his conviction. 1 While that appeal was pending, he filed a motion to vacate his sentence under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996). The trial court denied the motion, and Spencer noted a second appeal, which we consolidated with the first. Before this court Spencer makes three arguments. First, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; second, he maintains that the trial court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lanton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Koonce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.