Legal Opinion

Menkens v. Finley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1996No. S-94-832PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

In this personal injury negligence appeal, plaintiff-appellant Janice H. Menkens, now known as Janice H. Lameo, claims the trial court erred when it permitted the medical witness for defendants-appellees James T. Finley and Arron W. Finley to testify by videotape deposition rather than requiring the witness to personally appear and testify before the jury.

Menkens also claims the trial court erred in overruling her objections to certain testimony of the Finleys’ medical witness, Dr. Duane W. Krause.

We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the district court for a new…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Clearwater Corp. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ackles v. LuttrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Deuth v. RatiganNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Doe v. Gunny's Ltd. PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API