Legal Opinion

Ackles v. Luttrell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1997No. S-95-257PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Gary E. Ackles, brought this negligence and strict liability action against, among others, the appellee Pennwalt Corporation, now known as Elf Atochem North America, Inc. (Pennwalt), seeking damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of being exposed to an insecticide manufactured by Pennwalt. The district court granted Pennwalt’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempted Ackles’ failure-to-warn and labeling-based claims. We affirm in part, because we conclude that FIFRA preempts labeling-based…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Papas v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API