Legal Opinion

Harder v. Yates Center Water, Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1915No. 17,302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Woodson district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is a suit by which the plaintiff sought to enjoin the erection of an obstruction consisting of a dam in a stream which the petition alleged is a *316natural watercourse. In the original petition, which was filed December 26, 1905, it was alleged that the defendants were threatening • to construct the dam in question; that plaintiff owned two tracts of land, one comprising a half section and the other a quarter section through which Owl creek, runs, and that the erection of the dam would deprive him of the natural flow of the stream through…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Royal Salt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Meyn v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Blaine v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Harder v. Yates Center Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Cave v. HenleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Schrag v. Blaze Fork Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API