Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Stanley Wheeler petitions for review of a letter written by the District Director of the Williamsport District Office of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request to revoke a special parole condition that he “not contact or associate with Deborah Linden-muth 1 except as permitted, in writing, by parole agent — Mandatory.” 2 On appeal, Wheeler asserts that the Board abused its discretion by failing to revoke the condition. 3

In response to Wheeler’s petition for review, the Board has filed a Motion to Dismiss for Want of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Concerned Citizens v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Musheno v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Barge v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Williams v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API