Eddie James Strozier v. Lanson Newsome, Warden, Georgia State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
The sixth amendment guarantees not only a defendant’s right to the assistance of counsel at a criminal trial, but also the right to waive counsel and personally present his or her own defense. The defendant faces serious risks by pursuing the latter course, and the Supreme Court has required that the decision to proceed pro se be made knowingly and intelligently. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).
Although a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order competently and intelligently to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wainwright v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Gregory Lott v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. CrisafiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.