Legal Opinion
Gregory Lott v. Ralph Coyle, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2001No. 99-4155PublishedCited by 318 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Merritt, J.,
BOGGS, J. (pp. 621-24), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Gregory Lott (“Lott”) appeals from' the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, setting forth four bases for relief: (1) Lott’s case is prematurely before this Court inasmuch as the district court erroneously denied his request to conduct discovery and to hold an evidentiary hearing; (2) the three-judge panel that convicted him lacked jurisdiction; (3) Lott never executed a valid knowing, intelligent, and voluntary…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by318 opinions
- Mark Vroman v. Anthony Brigano, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- David Hudson v. Kurt JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Jeffrey Wogenstahl v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.