Moore v. Tuohy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Thisa action is to compel the specific performance of a contract. The contract is appended to the com plaint and made a part of it. It is quite lengthy, covering over seventeen pages of the printed transcript on appeal, bears date August 12, 1897, and relates to a large tract of land, about two thousand one hundred and forty acres, in Tulare County. Among other things, the agreement recites that on a certain designated portion of the land there is a basin of water which has been excavated about one hundred and twenty-five feet long and seventy feet wide, and that a cut or trench has been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Fargo v. New York & New England RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Calanchini v. BranstetterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ballard v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ellison v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Los Angeles & Bakersfield Oil & Development Co. v. Occidental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Roy v. PosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Moklofsky v. MoklofskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.