Legal Opinion
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2008No. Civil Action 07-812 (RMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
The Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin (“Tribe”) operates a health care system for tribal members pursuant to a self-determination contract with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS” or “Secretary”). The Tribe sues HHS for alleged breach of contract in the years 1995 through 2004. The Tribe alleges that HHS failed to compensate it fully for indirect contract support costs (“CSC”), despite clear contractual and statutory language in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pro Ftbl Inc v. Harjo, SuzanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Menominee Indian Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.