Renick v. City of Maryland Heights
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Judge.
The City of Maryland Heights appeals from the judgment of the trial court that found the zoning of Respondent-landowner’s property for residential use to be arbitrary, capricious, and, therefore, unconstitutional. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, as modified.
Respondent owns a parcel of land in the City of Maryland Heights near the intersection of Dorsett Road and Interstate 270. To the south is a Denny’s Restaurant located on the north side of the intersection of Dorsett Road and Interstate 270. On the south side of that intersection is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Cotton v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Randolph v. Missouri Highways & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Columbia Tower, Inc. v. Boone County MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- White v. City of BrentwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.