Legal Opinion

Renick v. City of Maryland Heights

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. 54782PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Judge.

The City of Maryland Heights appeals from the judgment of the trial court that found the zoning of Respondent-landowner’s property for residential use to be arbitrary, capricious, and, therefore, unconstitutional. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, as modified.

Respondent owns a parcel of land in the City of Maryland Heights near the intersection of Dorsett Road and Interstate 270. To the south is a Denny’s Restaurant located on the north side of the intersection of Dorsett Road and Interstate 270. On the south side of that intersection is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Cotton v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Randolph v. Missouri Highways & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Columbia Tower, Inc. v. Boone County MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. White v. City of BrentwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API