Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 2007No. WD 66269, WD 66289PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellants (“Property Owners”) own real and personal property in and around Carrollton, Missouri. They appeal the decision of the trial court in dismissing their personal property claims in an inverse condemnation action as being untimely and the denial of an award of attorney fees and costs in their inverse condemnation case for property damages. On cross-appeal, the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (“MHTC”) appeals the trial court’s grant of prejudgment interest. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Factual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Fair Mercantile Co. v. Union-May-Stern Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Pierson v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Long v. State of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Rickner v. GolfinopoulosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Smock v. Associated Elec. Coop., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Telester Ameena Powell v. The City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API