Dodds v. Stellar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff appeals from certain orders made in ancillary proceedings in his malpractice action and affecting the distribution of the proceeds of recovery by (1) granting the claimant “expenditures for compensation” and (2) denying plaintiff an allowance for attorney fees. Plaintiff argues: (1) the improper scope of the lien award and (2) the inequity of the disallowance of the attorney fee. His position is well taken as to the first point but not as to the second.
While employed as a workman in the yards of the California Shipbuilding Corporation, plaintiff “suffered a bruise and laceration ...…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winslow v. Harold G. Ferguson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. California Electric Works, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Jacobsen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Piuma v. MinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Summers v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.