Legal Opinion
Ihmoud v. Jett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 3, 2008No. 07-3979PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Federal inmate Walid Ihmoud brought suit claiming that prison authorities extorted restitution payments from him. Ihm-oud is serving a prison term of 38 years for arson and mail fraud, and as part of his sentence he was ordered to pay restitution of over a million dollars “immediately” or, if he was not able to make a lump-sum payment, in monthly installments of at least $500 beginning upon his release from prison. The sentencing court also recommended that Ihmoud participate in the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP) to develop a payment schedule during his incarceration. See…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Curtis L. Dale v. Harley G. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- James J. Valona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. DiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Stern v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, EricDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Antonio-Martinez, Jose v. Emmerich, WardenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Bojorquez-Valenzuela v. EmmerichDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.