Legal Opinion
Stern v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2009No. Civil Action 07-0609 (RMU)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Transferring the Action to the Southern District of Georgia
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The pro se plaintiff Ronald Stern is challenging the authority of the defendant, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“the Bureau”), to use the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”), 28 C.F.R. § 545.11, to regulate inmates’ restitution payment schedules. The plaintiff and the Bureau filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In its motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vetcher v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. RushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- GEWIN v. DodrillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. StewartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.