Legal Opinion
Archie Little v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 2014No. 12-CV-1812PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Appellant Archie Little appeals from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants/appellees C&E Services, Inc. (“C & E”) and the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (“DC Water”) on his claims of age discrimination in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”) 1 and (as to DC Water) tortious interference with his employment relationship with C & E. We affirm the judgment.
I
For several years prior to May 2009, appellant was employed by C & E, which had a series of contracts with DC Water to supply instrumentation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cathy S. NEUREN, Appellant, v. ADDUCI, MASTRIANI, MEEKS & SCHILL, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metz v. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- MICHELE TINGLING-CLEMMONS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and SANDRA ROBINSONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- ATIYA K. REEVES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016