Legal Opinion
Cathy S. NEUREN, Appellant, v. ADDUCI, MASTRIANI, MEEKS & SCHILL, Et Al., Appellees
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 17, 1995No. 93-7215PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
In 1991 appellee Adduci, Mastriani, Meeks & Schill (“AMM & S”), a Washington, D.C. law firm, terminated the employment of one of its senior associates, appellant Cathy Neu-ren. Neuren filed suit against both AMM & S and its individual partners in the U.S. District Court, alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1988). At trial, AMM & S offered into evidence both documentary and testimonial evidence relating, to Neuren’s performance at another…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence MedleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Mastro, Brian A. v. Potomac Elec PowerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Stewart, Sonya v. Evans, Donald L.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.