Fairchild v. Fairchild
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The two appeals herein are effectually from the same order: one from the minute entry of the court’s decision; the other from the documentary order modifying the interlocutory judgment of divorce which had been previously entered. Pursuant to a stipulation made then in open court the movable properties and money of the parties were apportioned by the decree. That document provided: “It is further ordered . . . that the following described real property . . . shall hereby be held in joint tenancy by the parties hereto subject to partition by further order of the court herein; the of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hogarty v. HogartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Wylie v. WylieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Schell v. SchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Barba v. BarbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Johnson v. LowarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Barry v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.