Legal Opinion

Barba v. Barba

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1951No. Civ. 18268PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, P. J.—

In an action -for divorce- plaintiff was awarded an interlocutory decree and it was adjudged that the real property in dispute “is the joint tenancy property of the parties hereto; that the plaintiff shall have and retain the exclusive possession and control of said real property during her lifetime, and that the defendant shall move and vacate therefrom on or before the 10th day of August, 1950, and deliver the exclusive possession thereof to plaintiff.”

The defendant has appealed from that part of the judgment above italicized and demands a reversal on the ground that the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Black v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Schell v. SchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Machado v. MachadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API