Birch Creek Irrigation v. Prothero
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Defendants Earl and Lynn Prothero appeal from the findings and order of the Sixth Judicial District Court in their dispute with plaintiffs Birch Creek Irrigation and water master Marvin Mayers. Initially, Birch Creek obtained a temporary restraining order against the Protheros. Then, at a hearing on Birch Creek’s motion for a preliminary injunction, the district court found Lynn Prothero in contempt of court and permanently enjoined both defendants from interfering with the water master or with Birch Creek’s water or other assets. We vacate the permanent injunction and hold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Envirotech Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Foothills Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Miller v. Martineau Co., C.P.A.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.