Legal Opinion
Ninth District Agricultural & Mechanical School v. Wofford Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 13, 1927No. 17937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “Declarations of an agent as to business transacted by him, in order to be admissible against his principal, must have been made by him while representing the principal in the transaction in controversy, and must also have been a part of the negotiation, -and constituting the res gestse.” National Building Asso. v. Quin, 120 Ga. 358 (2) (47 S. E. 962); Civil Code (1910), §§ 3606, 5779. “Admissions of the alleged agent of a corporation are not admissible to bind the corporation unless the agency be shown.” Amicalola Power Co. v. *272Coker, 111 Ga. 872 (36 S. E. 950); Ga. Steel Co. v. White, 136…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Building Ass'n v. QuinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Birmingham Lumber Co. v. Brinson & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Rawleigh Medical Co. v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Amicalola Marble & Power Co. v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Dougan & Sheftall v. DunhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Watkins Products, Inc. v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Chambers v. Williams Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Terminal Transport Co. v. Decatur Truck & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Roper v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Millsaps v. Strange Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.