Legal Opinion

Millsaps v. Strange Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1928No. 18250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In a suit upon an account, wliere from the testimony of the plaintiff’s bookkeeper the jury could have inferred: that he made all the entries in the plaintiff’s books and kept the books correctly; that the entries were made by him in the usual order of business, from original sales tickets delivered to him by the plaintiff’s clerks or salesmen, who made and delivered the tickets simultaneously with sales and as mere memoranda thereof; that the witness did not make the sales, and that his knowledge of the account was limited to the facts stated, but that from these facts, including the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marshall v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. English v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Fielder, Bros. & Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Jenkins v. National Mutual B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salters v. Pugmire Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Davis Construction Co. v. Granite Sand & Gravel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Eley v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Herrington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API