Terminal Transport Co. v. Decatur Truck & Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
1. The general grounds are abandoned. The special grounds and the objections thereto are: “Ground 1. Because the plaintiff was allowed by the court to place an employee and witness of the defendant on the witness stand for the purpose of cross-examination prior to his direct examination by defendant’s attorney. Movant objected to this procedure as soon as and at the time plaintiff sought so to do. The following took place: ‘Mr. John B. Lambert, called by the plaintiff for the purpose of cross-examination, testified as follows: Cross-examination by Mr. Shoob. Q. What is your name? A. John B.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friese v. Simpson & HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Amicalola Marble & Power Co. v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Ninth District Agricultural & Mechanical School v. Wofford Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDevitt & Street Co. v. K-C Air Conditioning Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Augusta Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. ClemmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. RapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CumbieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Wren v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.