Legal Opinion

Terminal Transport Co. v. Decatur Truck & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1954No. 35368PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

1. The general grounds are abandoned. The special grounds and the objections thereto are: “Ground 1. Because the plaintiff was allowed by the court to place an employee and witness of the defendant on the witness stand for the purpose of cross-examination prior to his direct examination by defendant’s attorney. Movant objected to this procedure as soon as and at the time plaintiff sought so to do. The following took place: ‘Mr. John B. Lambert, called by the plaintiff for the purpose of cross-examination, testified as follows: Cross-examination by Mr. Shoob. Q. What is your name? A. John B.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friese v. Simpson & HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Amicalola Marble & Power Co. v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Ninth District Agricultural & Mechanical School v. Wofford Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McDevitt & Street Co. v. K-C Air Conditioning Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Augusta Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. ClemmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. RapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CumbieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Wren v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API