Burns v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, J. *
Plaintiff Burns appeals from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining without leave to amend a general demurrer to his second amended complaint. We explain why we sustain the judgment.
Plaintiff is alleged * to be a licensed real estate broker and general building contractor. Defendants are the. City of Folsom, the members of its city council, Marvin J. May, its building inspector, Cyrus Thomas, its “administrator of city functions,” and James E. Buchanan, its commissioner of city planning.
There are, and were during the time the acts and omissions referred to in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- G & D Holland Construction Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ellis v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Elson v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Burchett v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.