Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Farnsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1949No. 14009Published

1DissentBond, Chief Justice

The majority opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court presents a fair ré-sumé of the record upon which the judgment is based. We differ as to the legal conclusions that the operator of the involved street car was guilty of negligence proximately causing appellee’s alleged injuries; that the appellee was not guilty of. contributory negligence; and that the extent of appellee’s alleged injuries justifies the amount recovered, — $12,518. Other assignments of error — I am not in accord with the majority — they will receive casual mention.

The ofttime- pronouncement that negligence, '…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. ShetterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rogers v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Townsend v. Houston Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Feagins v. Texas MacHinery & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API