Legal Opinion

Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Rogers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1949No. A-1953PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

Respondent H. E. Rogers for himself and as next friend of his eleven year old daughter, Venetia, brought this action against petitioner for the recovery of damages arising from injuries suffered by the child when she was struck by petitioner’s bus at a street intersection in the business district of the City of Dallas. Judgment was rendered for petitioner, the defendant in trial court, on account of the jury’s findings that the child was guilty of contributory negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout and in failing to stop immediately prior to the impact. The Court of Civil Appeals…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cook v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Schroeder v. RainboldtTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ShifletTexas Supreme Court · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. FarnsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Patterson v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Massie v. CopelandTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Edward Taylor v. Carolyn Marie BairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API