Legal Opinion

Feagins v. Texas MacHinery & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1916No. 7457. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by the Texas Machinery & Supply Company against N. B. Feagins and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee sued appellants upon two promissory notes aggregating $2,294.25, executed by appellants and payable to appellee, seeking judgment for the principal, interest, attorney's fees, and foreclosure of lien upon an engine in payment of which the notes were given. Appellants admitted execution of the notes and the lien, but alleged that the consideration therefor had failed. In connection with such plea it was alleged that the engine was guaranteed to be of good material, to furnish sufficient power to operate a four 70 saw Continental cotton gin plant in a steady and reliable manner, so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Fox v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wilson v. Avery Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Murray v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morten Inv. Co. v. TreveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. White v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. J. Lee Vilbig & Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Peters v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Brinker v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API